This is a
long post. The meeting that I
describe below concluded, then I sat down in a room here in one of our project
villages and tapped out the story on my tablet while the local staff were busy.
It was a new opportunity to record a full story with details that really
describe what some of our work is like.
So, enjoy it for what it is, or skip it!
How do
you face a group of village elders who have been angry for months about the
results of your work? I was thinking this to myself for the past week while the
plan was made for me to do just that. To explain why that became the plan, we
have to go back several months.
Remember the well project with the pants-less well digger? What I
haven't told, because I have just learned it, is that before I came to this
part of the country the engineer before me was a bit careless in his surveying,
and he led people to believe he was promising more than the project had
capability to deliver. Without communicating much, he surveyed for a large
water reservoir above the village, which could be the source for several
gravity-fed pipes to different areas in the village. To him it was just surveying for future but unfortunately
the villagers that watched him do this believed it was the definite "phase
II" of the project that he was looking at. Learning this recently has helped me understand better why
this community has had such a hard time managing to share the single reservoir we
fixed and piped water to.
The
frustration from the community has come out in different ways. Many of its members have complained
that there is not enough water, or that they never get their turn to get
water. Another symptom has
been that those living close to the reservoir have considered it their right to
take as much water as they want, and those living further away do not have the
same ability. Those that are
getting less water and hauling it more distance are quite disgusted with the
others, and some have quit using this clean water source and gone back the
river for water collection.
The
unequal use of water, and those that have walked away from the clean water,
poses more problems in regard to community's expense. You see, water doesn't reach the reservoir for free, it is
pumped up the valley from the well we helped them dig, and the community shares
the electric utility expense on the well pump, as well as a monthly wage for
local "water manager". Less people using the water means the division
of the utility and wage goes up for the others. Water hogs drive the cost up more. In this situation it is understandable how those that are
paying for water, but not getting enough of it, are furious.
So why
don't people get enough water? It is not that the well runs dry and has to be
shutoff to recharge. It is a
combination of the overuse by some, and the limited timeframe to collect water
for all. The time to collect water is limited because the pump is only turned
on for a few hours of the day. Why is that? Perhaps because they don't
want to
run up the electric bill? Or because electricity is in only available part of
the day? No, it's actually because
the pump is only run in the afternoon, which is when people are used to
collecting water, and the afternoon is not long enough for everyone to get the
amount of water they need, especially considering the water hogs!
Wait,
there's two more elements to add to the situation: gender, and age. It used to be that water was collected
by women or children, in the afternoon, as they would take their donkeys to the
river and load them with water jugs.
Now that water collection has moved to the center of the village, in a
religious space by the mosque, there are new dynamics. Women who are not from the houses
immediately around the reservoir are not supposed to be in spaces like this, so
instead the men from those houses have had to collect the water. Don't cheer about that however, because
they have made it hard for the women and children who still collect water for
their houses nearby the reservoir.
In this culture children and women are most always expected to yield to
men. Actually in this case no one
is winning, everyone is angry. The
women from the far houses are angry because they can no longer get water with
other women, and their men are angry because they have to get it. Then the women from the nearer houses
are angry because the men from further are cutting in line, and their men are
angry because their women and children don't always get water.
So,
there's the stage of the situation. How would you have gone in? I thought and prayed about it a ton,
because I was very concerned about what could happen in this village if we
didn't find a resolution. Finally when I left for the village I had three short
lists: 1- things to listen for and encourage, 2- topics to steer away from, and
3- points to assert. I won't even
share those lists with you however, because from the first speaker at the
meeting I realized it was going an entirely different route!
I arrived
in the room with 10 grumpy, white-bearded elders, we exchanged nice greetings,
then we got right to it. The first
man said, "from the beginning we were told there would be a big reservoir
above the village (the one mistakenly surveyed), and we also need a backup
generator." I was taken aback
because these first two points drove right into the areas I wanted to steer
away from! So, I asked them to
tell me more about what it meant for them to not have those things. As they described the problems
affecting them, I began to weave in suggestions of my alternate solution,
hoping we could leave their desired solutions behind. Thank God it worked!
As I began to gain momentum with the suggestion of adding two more pipes
instead of another pump and reservoir, I turned the discussion toward the social
matters that were in their hands; matters that I saw as prerequisites to us
doing any more material projects.
My one local staff who went with me (and sat by silently, thanks for the
help buddy) said later that only a foreigner could address a circle of elders
and say that the root problem was that the community had not made sufficient
agreements. i first asserted that
they needed to agree on the limits for the use of the clean water or the abuses
and frustration would continue. I
also asserted that until they made a daily schedule for water collection by the
different parts of the community, that no amount of water or reservoirs would
bring peace back to their village.
With my
chips on the discussion table, the leaders began to argue with me about the
superiority of their solution.
They really wanted to skirt the difficult social matters and convince me
to commit the funds to build them a bigger reservoir. I didn't tell them no, but instead laid out the negative
consequences I saw from their plan: people would continue to hog water,
separating collection locations without a schedule would only slow the time it
takes to fill each jug, and their electric expense would double with the
addition of another pump.
At this
point they turned to their village dialect (I had been talking with them in the
national language) so that they could talk about me, in front of my back,
privately. Their interaction got
quite heated, but eventually the leader turned back to me and said, "how
do you suggest we go from here then?" I laid out for them a four-stage plan: 1- they would
determine as a community how the clean water may and may not be used (I.e. only
drinking and cooking? Bathing also? Washing also? Animals also? Gardens also?
Construction also?) They would also
decide a time of each day for each of the 3 sections of the village to collect
water, and stick to this plan. 2- We will come next week, survey both the
social matters and the physical possibility of adding two pipes to the two
further sections. If all looks
good, we'll work with them to put in the pipes as soon as they're ready to do
the labor. 3- then we will spend
the winter encouraging the community to stick to the new system, and record
their usage and expense over several months. 4- In the spring, if they still think another reservoir
would serve them better, then we have the data to do a thorough operating
expense projection, and can figure and share that with the community so that
they can make an informed decision.
More
arguments followed, but my suggestion gathered enough acceptance right away
that my new proponents did the refuting for me. Another round of arguments in the village dialect solved,
the leader turned to me and said, "your plan is excellent and appropriate,
we could not have agreed on this without you."
Before we
left the room I commented on their wish for a generator, saying that it was
outside our policy (we only do renewable energy projects), but if they wrote a
proposal we could advocate for them to other agencies. With that door for
another false assumption closed, we called the meeting to a close, went outside
and took a look at the locations for the suggested extra pipes.
The
walking tour of the locations for the extra pipes was a great chance to listen
to the elders more, and make sure they understood what they agreed with! I'm still concerned that the men might
not have understood me, but rather assumed they were hearing what they wanted
to hear! My other concern is if
"the right ones" were not in today's meeting. We should find this out in the next
visit!
I sense
that we are not out of the woods yet. There have been a lot of twists and turns
in this story and I should not be surprised if I have still missed another
angle of this situation. The
learning here never seems to end.
I hope this becomes a case study someday!
ReplyDelete